Why should anyone read Tolkien? For refreshment and entertainment. Why should anyone take his work seriously? — as seriously (and that is very serious indeed) as he took it? Because it is tough, uncompromising, honest.
Because it confronts directly, albeit imaginatively, those two awkward, embarrassing, even forbidden subjects which our time shrinks from: death, and the relationship between humanity and God.
If we do read Tolkien, and if we do take him seriously, we may learn about ourselves — learn much that we did not know and even more than we once knew and have now forgotten.
There is a Society. I have been its member for some years. I am very uncomfortable, but I have to ask: Is the Tolkien Society turning into the Society of Many Colours? Like Saruman? Keep the question open. In the meantime, I will tell you a few short stories and give you some opinions.
Artwork by a member of the Tolkien Society |
My first encounter with the censorship on the Facebook Group of the Tolkien Society
was long ago when I wanted to show to others my photographs from Tolkien's church of St. Aloysius in
Oxford, with his favourite statue of Virgin Mary. They told me that
"religious" content is forbidden. I was in shock! You can see my picture here:
This gave Tolkien and The Lord of the Rings
tremendous moral strength
The same was when I wanted to wish Christmas greetings to the members using Tolkien's words from Athrabeth Finrod ah Andreth. After several such situations, a person begins to censor himself. Like during the "Cultural Revolution" in China. We in Poland remember very well the times of censorship, when the communist authorities did not allow for public discussions about Christian faith and morality.
I
am a translator of books from English into Polish. Right now I'm
working on Two Little Savages, a classic of children's literature by
Ernest Thomspon Seton. In the Forum, I asked if Tolkien might have known
this book. Another censorship block happened. I described the situation here:
This cover is forbidden or about the "political correctness"
in the Tolkien fandom
I will later return to my story...
Carl F. Hostetter, outstanding researcher of Tolkien, editor of the Professor's linguistic notes, successor of Christopher Tolkien, friend of Priscilla Tolkien, who will publish an important work in the autumn, The Nature of Middle-earth (HarperCollins, collected linguistic, geographic, philosophical, theological notes etc.), wrote at the Tolkien Society's Discussion Forum:
"'The Lord of the Rings is of course a fundamentally religious and Catholic work' — J. R. R. Tolkien. I guess it's OK to prohibit discussion of the fundamental aspects of the writings of an author, by a society devoted to and whose president in perpetuity is the same author. Stands to reason!"
And later:
"In my long experience, it is almost never the person who raises the topic of Tolkien and Christianity that creates a problem ― rather, it is those who are hostile to Christianity who do so. Banning discussion of the subject entirely (1) eliminates discussion of a fundamental aspect of Tolkien's legendarium, (2) rewards those who cannot brook any mention of Tolkien's Christianity, and (3) punishes those who have no ill will but only an intellectual interest. That is what I object to."
I myself was banned by Collier many months ago. Why? There were probably many reasons: my protests against the censorship of Christian themes, my commitment to and defence of Project Northmoor (see here), my criticism of the Society's lack of efforts to organize the Writer's Museum and to look after his grave in winter. And, in fact, world view differences. Collier likened me in private to "alt-right", "bigot", and "religious fanatic".
Unfortunately, it seems that in 2021 J. R. R. Tolkien himself would also have to be careful in the Tolkien Society about the censorship of his statements and the ban. In a private conversation, I suggested to a very prominent TS member, that Tolkien would be also called "homophobic" or "racist" by them, because he was a conservative Christian, a faithful Roman Catholic:
He answered:
―If Tolkien had that opinion, then yes he would be. The Society doesn't promote Tolkien's views. (...) We do not have to agree with him, nor do we have to promote (or agree with) his views.
And I ask: "The Society of Many Colours"? And I don't mean the rainbow flag of social justice warriors. I think wider. In Tolkien's style. I am sure you remember Saruman of Many Colours and the words of J. R. R. Tolkien in Rotterdam in 1958, during the "Hobbit Dinner" (see here):
I look East, West, North, South, and I do not see Sauron; but I see that Saruman has many descendants. We Hobbits have against them no magic weapons. Yet, my gentlehobbits, I give you this toast: To the Hobbits. May they outlast the Sarumans and see spring again in the trees.
"[Tolkien] wished more than anything to ‘make England Catholic’ again, and in doing so to reintroduce beauty, purity, and love to his country.”
— Maker of Middle-earth, p. 157.
And I call:Make the Society "Tolkien" again!
A good article by a Tolkien scholar, Prof. Bradley J. Birzer
OdpowiedzUsuńhttps://www.nationalreview.com/2021/06/j-r-r-tolkiens-work-transcends-wokeness/
All my friends have already been censored, or attacked by the members … but I left the Society, for a month now, and I realized Tolkien would not be on this group.
OdpowiedzUsuńThank you for your testimony, my Friend, Joao!
Usuń